The study is the first to give an intergenerational view of the impact a parent’s behavior has on children.
By Neal Simpson, Patriot Ledger
CANTON, Mass. — It’s been a rite of passage for decades: At the age of 18, students still in high school are suddenly able to vote in elections, serve in the military and buy cigarettes.
But as the tobacco industry renews its push to reach young would-be smokers with innovative products -– like electronic cigarettes and flavored “cigarillos” -– several South Shore communities are joining a growing movement to keep tobacco products out of high schools by pushing the legal purchasing age back to 19 or even 21. Canton and Sharon made the move to 21 last year, and Braintree and Scituate officials are now considering similar regulations, news partner The Patriot Ledger reports.
“We’re trying to keep tobacco out of younger kids’ hands,” said John Ciccotelli, director of public health in Canton, which banned tobacco sales to people under 21 at the start of the year. “The main avenue for them getting tobacco is that three to four-year-older group that is still young enough to be hanging around with these younger kids and may be sharing their cigarettes with them.”
The move to age 21 for tobacco sales, which was unheard of a decade ago, is now seen as inevitable by many health officials and even by tobacco shop owners. Six Massachusetts towns now ban tobacco sales to anyone younger than 21 and New York City is set to become the first major city in the U.S. to make the move in May, though the new law still faces legal challenges.
The push to raise the tobacco-purchasing age has accelerated rapidly in the last year, coming as many communities scramble to update their regulations to address a flood of new “nicotine-delivery devices” such as electronic cigarettes. Just two years ago, the town of Needham was the only municipality in the country that required consumers to be 21 to purchase tobacco, according to D.J. Wilson, tobacco control director for the Massachusetts Municipal Association.
“This is all very new,” he said.
Dr. Lester Hartman, a Needham physician who has spent the last year convincing health boards across eastern Massachusetts to increase the tobacco-purchasing age, said new research into addiction has made the move an easy sell. He and another physician, Jonathan Winickoff, point to recent neuroscientific evidence showing that adolescent brains are more susceptible to the addictive qualities of nicotine, making teenagers likely to become addicted to the drug more quickly while smoking less often than adults.
The research is also borne out by studies of today’s smoking population. A 2012 report from the U.S. surgeon general found that 88 percent of adults who smoke daily had started by the time they were 18, while 99 percent started by the time they were 26.
“Studies have shown definitively that the earlier a smoker starts, the harder it is for them to quit,” said Wilson, the tobacco control director. “If we can at least delay the age of initiation … it’ll be easier for them to quit, and they won’t be a smoker for as long.”
Creating minor barriers for teenagers seeking cigarettes has shown to dramatically lower youth smoking rates, Hartman said. In Needham, the smoking rate among high school students dropped from 12.9 percent before new tobacco regulations were adopted in 2005 to 6.7 percent in 2010.
Hartman, who lives in Needham, said the drop came despite the fact that students could have gone into nearby towns to buy cigarettes. After seeing the effects of the new regulations in his own town, he joined forces with Winickoff in late 2012 and began going from town to town trying to persuade health boards to make similar changes.
“The key with all this is it’s only a small group, it’s only one town, but it makes a huge difference in that town,” he said. “We know if we go town by town, we’ll get to 351.”
The trend has already raised concerns in the retail industry, which sees the age limits as an unwarranted obstacle to consumer choice and convenience as well as a hardship for retailers. Stephen Ryan, executive director of the New England Convenience Store Association, said shop owners worry that they will soon be faced with a patchwork of age restrictions that may put them at a disadvantage based on which town they’re in.
“You’re putting them in a position where you’re going to be losing customers to a store that is a block away or maybe a hundred yards away but happens to be on the other side of the town line,” he said.
But some in the tobacco business say the changes won’t make much of a difference. Geoff Yalenezian, a member of the family that owns six Brennan’s Smoke Shop locations in Southeastern Massachusetts, said teenagers are a tiny fraction of his stores’ clientele and tend to be the ones who give his staff the most trouble about showing identification to verify their age.
Brennan’s shops are all in towns that allow sales to 18-year-olds, but Yalenezian said he has no doubt that will change soon.
“It is what it is,” he said. “Tell me what the rules are; tell me what the laws are, and I’ll abide by them.”
Maggie Fox NBC News
Smoking rates cut in half. Eight million lives saved. More than 800,000 fewer lung cancer deaths. Fifty years after the U.S. Surgeon General first warned about the dangers of smoking, the benefits of quitting have never been clearer.
Yet 18 percent of the population still smokes. Nearly 2,000 teenagers take up the habit every day and tobacco companies advertise candy-flavored tobacco products with impunity. Is it possible this is the best the United States will ever do?
Health experts are convinced it isn’t — and they point to maps that rank states and regions by smoking status as proof. A look at a county-by-county breakdown of who smokes and where makes it clear that there are opportunities to get smoking rates way down, they say.
Kentucky has the most smokers — more than 28 percent of the population smokes there, compared to just 11 percent in Utah, which has the lowest rates, and double the 14 percent in California. And when you overlay those smoking maps with details of rates of heart disease, stroke and cancer, it’s equally clear that there are still plenty of lives to be saved by trying.
“(With) taxes, strong smoke-free laws and fully funding state tobacco prevention programs,” says Dr. Mariell Jessup, president of the American Heart Association. “These measures can reduce the number of adult smokers to less than 10 percent of the population in 10 years.”
Also, raising the legal age to buy tobacco products to 21 would go a long way to stopping kids from ever getting addicted in the first place, the Heart Association, American Lung Association, American Cancer Society, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and other groups agree.
“We do it with booze yet we don’t do it with cigarettes, when cigarettes kill about 10 times more people than alcohol does,” says Dr. Michael Fiore of the University of Wisconsin’s Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention.
Smoking is often just another marker for social and economic disparities, Fiore adds. “Fewer than 10 percent of college graduates smoke,” Fiore points out. But 35 percent of people who never graduated from high school do.
“Two things will solve this issue over time and eliminate tobacco use. One is hard-hitting public policy. At the same time, we need the ready availability of treatments for smokers.”
A 50 year public health battle
It was Jan. 11, 1964 when then-Surgeon General Dr. Luther Terry held a news conference to announce that smoking causes cancer and probably heart disease, too. It was a time when close to half of Americans smoked — including Terry himself — and it set off a 50-year battle between regulators and the tobacco industry.
Video – From the Archives: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer: The federal government’s report presented January 11, 1964 on smoking and health was a landmark report spelling out the negative health effects of smoking. NBC’s Frank McGee reports.
Since then, science has proven beyond any doubt that smoking causes most cases of lung cancer, most heart disease and lung disease as well as stroke and a range of cancers from breast to bladder. Researchers have proven that nicotine is one of the most addictive substances known, and that tobacco companies deliberately manipulate nicotine levels in their products to get people hooked on the first cigarette and keep them hooked for life.
In a study published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Theodore Holford of the Yale School of Public Health and colleagues estimated that 17.7 million people died between 1964 and 2012 because of smoking. But they also calculated that tobacco control measures saved 8 million lives. And the average American lives two years longer than they otherwise would have, they said. Smoking rates have plummeted from 42 percent of the population in 1965 to 18 percent today.
Yet smoking still kills 1 in 5 Americans, or 440,000 people a year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. That includes more than 49,000 people who die from the effects of secondhand smoke.
And tobacco companies kept up the fight. When they failed to cast doubt on the health effects of smoking, they re-framed the issue as one of personal choice. When schools, cities and employers completely banned smoking on their premises, companies advertised cigarettes as stress-relievers and subtly encouraged smokers to feel like they were somehow edgy rebels instead of tobacco addicts.
Shaking a national addiction
Health experts say there are still ways to get smoking rates lower, even as policymakers grapple with new battles over e-cigarettes.One is to stop people from smoking in the first place, says Dr. James Perrin, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
“Eighty-eight percent or more of lifetime smokers start before they turn age 18,” he told NBC News. The adolescent brain is particularly susceptible to the addicting effects of nicotine, and just raising the legal age to buy tobacco to 21 would help get kids past the most vulnerable point, he says.
Perrin joins other health experts in urging the Food and Drug Administration to take a firmer hand. “Four years ago, the U.S. stopped sales of candy-flavored cigarettes because they are particularly appealing to children,” Perrin said. Yet little cigars flavored like cotton candy, grape and even gummy bears remain on the market. Such products are not aimed at 40-year-olds, Perrin maintains.
Taxes also have been shown to reduce smoking rates. But they are nowhere as near as high as they should be, argues Dick Woodruff of the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Action Network. “Taxes work,” Woodruff told reporters. But federal taxes are just a dollar a pack. “It’s just ridiculous,” he says. “We need to overcome the anathema Congress has on taxes and revenues and educate them.”
States add their own taxes, and Kentucky, the state with the highest smoking rates, adds just 60 cents a pack, while New York adds $4.35 a pack and Massachusetts $3.50. Studies show that the people most likely to smoke are also the most sensitive to price.
Experts also argue that states aren’t spending these tax revenues properly in helping people to stop smoking. They’re also not using a big pot of money called the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement from a giant lawsuit settled in 1998 between the attorneys general of 46 states and the four biggest tobacco companies. It provides $206 billion over 25 years — that’s more than $175 million a year per state, or more than $8 billion a year for all the states. Yet states spent just $640 million on tobacco control efforts in 2010.
Warning: Danger inside the pack
Tobacco companies have fought and lobbied against every measure. But anti-tobacco activists marked a victory on Friday. Tobacco companies and the federal government reached an agreement on a series of “corrective statements” the companies must publish. It comes from a 2006 ruling in which Washington, D.C., federal district judge Gladys Kessler ruled that the cigarette companies conspired for decades to conceal the dangers of smoking.
Under the agreement with the Justice Department , each of the companies must publish full-page ads in the Sunday editions of 35 newspapers and on the newspapers’ websites, as well as air prime-time TV spots on NBC, CBS or ABC five times per week for a year. They’ve been fighting over the wording, says Vince Willmore of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “The companies have appealed every step of the way,” he said.
These ads must say, for instance:
The companies also must publish the statements on their own websites and affix them to a certain number of cigarette packs three times per year for two years.
Something else — doctors need to nag their patients more, says Fiore. “I would never dream of letting a patient with high blood pressure leave my office without treating it,” Fiore said. “But every day in America, millions of Americans go in and out of a physician’s office and their smoking is not treated.”
BOSTON —Lighting up a cigarette in any Boston park, including the iconic Boston Common and Public Garden, may soon draw a $250 fine, which doesn’t sit well with smokers who over the years have seen the places they are allowed to enjoy a cigarette shrink.
I would like to personally thank all of those that participated in seeing this ban through. I have suffered with asthma my entire life. I’m sure due in part to being born 3 months premature and having under developed lungs. I have actually been allergic to any kind of smoke and become quite ill when around it including nausea, vomiting, hives, extreme shortness of breath, pigheadedness and even passing out dependent on how bad the exposure. I have tried to avoid smokers whenever possible, but in public places I have never been able to do anything about it. Parking lots, walking in the streets, parks, my front porch, my back yard, the beach, parks, etc. People smoke all around me. My husband smokes, but never in the house, it doesn’t mean that I’m not exposed to the smell of him when he reenters the house, I get sick every time. I’ve never made the choice to smoke and I certainly don’t want to have no choice in continuing to be a second hand smoker. Thank you for making things just a little easier for people like me.
As for those who smoke and might be upset by this ban, think of someone you love playing in a park and over time people visit and continue smoking and your loved one doesn’t smoke, but yet they are diagnosed with lung cancer as a second hand smoke and end up dying. This may be a little extreme, but it is reality. No one should be allowed to do anything that potentially causes some one else to lose their life, especially when they did nothing wrong.
|Backwards In Time©… on Boston Latin School violated C…|
|Felina on Shakespeare Piece of the Day:…|
|aubreyleaman on Shakespeare Piece of the Day:…|
|Heartafire on The Soaring Costs of EpiP…|
|Felina on Oh What Kind of Mushroom Am…|